<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theatre Review: The Andersen Project by Robert Lepage&#8217;s Ex Machina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=56" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56</link>
	<description>A cultural guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:45:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colette Gosselin</title>
		<link>http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56&#038;cpage=1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Colette Gosselin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Please let me know how I can get tickets to his show in Montreal May 16.Thanks Colette</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let me know how I can get tickets to his show in Montreal May 16.Thanks Colette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen reed</title>
		<link>http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56&#038;cpage=1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>karen reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Please do yourself a favour and keep the money for something else. There are a lot of interesting visual ideas in the andersen project but it&#039;s repetitive and boring after 20 minutes to see all these flashes and no real content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do yourself a favour and keep the money for something else. There are a lot of interesting visual ideas in the andersen project but it&#8217;s repetitive and boring after 20 minutes to see all these flashes and no real content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56&#038;cpage=1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nick, glad you enjoyed the review and the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nick, glad you enjoyed the review and the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick mercer</title>
		<link>http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56&#038;cpage=1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>nick mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mylondonyourlondon.com/?p=56#comment-59</guid>
		<description>saw it tonight and was engaged throughout despite the vertiginous seats of the upper circle which like mrs danvers seem to surreptitiously incline you into the pit. i found myself at a loss to describe it, simply transformed in the telling into &#039;the bad victorian novel&#039; you describe. i went on a whim; meant to check him out years ago but ... moved to tears of joy when he danced with the strobe. its the affect within &#039;the eerily polished&#039; - and the authority of the insight into human nature - the manipulator in relapse re his sex addiction. no false notes. i kept checking the programme to assure myself it was just him - uncanny. I struggled with the dryad&#039;s &#039;woodenness&#039;despite the obvious and felt the descent of disbelief - no, thats not fair, more accurately it was the one time in 2 hours i felt i had to work hard and that was more a minor technical point; the lack of fuse between her and the contemporary 1867 backdrop. anyway, thanks for an excellent review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw it tonight and was engaged throughout despite the vertiginous seats of the upper circle which like mrs danvers seem to surreptitiously incline you into the pit. i found myself at a loss to describe it, simply transformed in the telling into &#8216;the bad victorian novel&#8217; you describe. i went on a whim; meant to check him out years ago but &#8230; moved to tears of joy when he danced with the strobe. its the affect within &#8216;the eerily polished&#8217; &#8211; and the authority of the insight into human nature &#8211; the manipulator in relapse re his sex addiction. no false notes. i kept checking the programme to assure myself it was just him &#8211; uncanny. I struggled with the dryad&#8217;s &#8216;woodenness&#8217;despite the obvious and felt the descent of disbelief &#8211; no, thats not fair, more accurately it was the one time in 2 hours i felt i had to work hard and that was more a minor technical point; the lack of fuse between her and the contemporary 1867 backdrop. anyway, thanks for an excellent review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
