My London Your London

A cultural guide

Page 5 of 42

Children’s Theatre Review: Snow Play at The Pleasance (Edinburgh preview)

by Sarah Cope

“It won’t be cold for long, Mr White. There’s something under the snow.”

With Edinburgh festival “previews” now running all over the city, Londoners are even more spoilt for choice than usual when it comes to the capital’s cultural smorgasbord. This is also the case for “mini-Londoners”, and this week my four-year-old and I went along to see the Lyngo Theatre Company’s Snow Play. The company had a hit with this play at the Lyric Hammersmith over Christmas, but how would a wintry play work for a summer audience?

When it became apparent that there were only going to be about seven of us in the audience I became worried about the word “interactive”. As it turned out, I needn’t have fretted, because the play was charming and engaging, and the interaction was probably made easier by the intimacy of the audience. Indeed, my daughter, not usually one for overcoming her shyness in front of groups of strangers, got so involved that without prompting she went up to the front and helped coat Mr White in “snow”.

I had had visions of the play utilising real snow, and the auditorium being chilled to an uncomfortable degree. However, on entering the theatre it became apparent that this was not the case, and that instead the company had utilised feathers, white fibre and wadding, which with imaginative lighting and billowing winds was immensely effective (although I couldn’t help wondering whether children with asthma and allergies might not get on too well, and might be advised to sit near the back. We were right at the front and could’ve certainly have done with a “de-linting” after the show had ended!).
Continue reading

Exhibition Review: Tracey Emin: Love Is What You Want, at The Hayward Gallery

by Sarah Cope

“What a lot of glorified self-pity!” complained one American male visitor as he surveyed the five rooms dedicated to the art of Tracey Emin, in this her first London retrospective. Listening to comments made by fellow visitors is always amusing, and Emin’s work seems to provoke strong reactions in both directions.

On first entering the gallery, visitors are confronted by Emin’s applique blankets. Reminiscent of homemade protest banners, Emin takes the ‘womanly’ craft of quilting and turns it on its head. These are angry pieces (‘You cruel heartless bitch. Rot in hell.’), although it isn’t clear who the anger is aimed at. Is it anger towards herself, Emin of course being her favourite subject? Or are these remembered insults, haunting and revisiting Emin at vulnerable moments?

The blankets also reveal much about Emin’s chaotic lifestyle, with alcohol playing a big part in perhaps both the events depicted on them and in their creation. She recounts vomiting down the back of a taxi driver’s neck, or pulling condom after condom out of her vagina in the bath, having little idea how they got there. Not the sort of events depicted on blankets made by local pensioners’ groups, I would imagine.

Several of Emin’s films are being played on a loop in various spaces throughout the exhibition. The excellent ‘Why I Never Became a Dancer’ (1995), features Emin at her most jubilant, witty and confident (and should be watched by anyone who thinks her default setting is miserable). Explaining how she made it to the finals of a dancing competition (she took up dancing at the age of fifteen, having grown tired of sex), she was shouted off the stage by a group of boys who were chanting “Slag! Slag! Slag!” in an effort to put her off. The story is told over grainy Super 8 footage of Margate, the seaside town of her childhood.

Emin recalls “And I left Margate, and I left those boys. Shane, Richard, Eddie, Tony – this one’s for you.” Cue footage of a smiling, ecstatic Emin dancing in 1995 to Sylvester’s ‘You Make Me Feel (Mighty Real)’. Success as revenge is a theme which features heavily in her work, and here it is writ large.

In another longer film, ‘How It Feels’, Emin recounts her experience of having a badly botched abortion in 1990. Standing outside her doctor’s surgery, she recalls how her (religious) doctor tried to persuade her to have the baby, and put off signing the consent form for six weeks. She said how she still felt like going inside and smashing the place up, so full of anger was she that she had been made to beg for his consent.
Continue reading

Theatre Review: The Prisoner of Windsor at the Leicester Square Theatre

by Natalie Bennett
(First published on Blogcritics)

Are some things beyond satire? When I got the press notice about Justin Butcher’s plan to write a satire about that Royal Wedding, several weeks before the event itself, I wondered.

I’m not an obvious person to go to see this – I never saw the real thing, and I read the absolute minimum about it that I could manage, but having seen and admired Butcher’s The Madness of George Dubya in my pre-blogging days, I thought it might be worth a shot.

And I don’t regret that decision. Which isn’t to say this is a triumph, or anything like it, or even really properly a satire at all, a mildly entertaining, unchallenging evening pretty well does it – I’ve had a lot worse, even if it does have the feel a slightly underprepared university production.

And answering my own initial question, I rather think this does demonstrate that the royal wedding was beyond satire.

Butcher has slid in some of the obvious lines – “we are wicked spongers” say the slacking palace gardeners, “me too”, says Prince Wills (John Sheerman) – but his heart clearly isn’t really in it.

There’s also moments of classy physical comedy – the Queen’s (Stephen Guy Daltry) morning ministrations to Prince Philip (Simon de Deney) a small piece of nicely shaped slapstick. And obligatory jokes attached to an other-worldly, but unhealthily amiable Archbiship of Canterbury (Damian Kell).

Also, this is billed as a musical comedy, but be warned that there’s little in the way of music.

What this primarily could be described as a madcap alternative history that leans heavily on the reimagining of well-known predecessors – featuring the illegitimate son of Philip (also played by de Deney), who’s now one of a team of illegal immigrant gardeners – he’s Romanian, there’s an Albanian, an Algerian and an accordian-playing Bosnian – who come into contact with the cold-feeted Wills on wedding eve, with fairly predictable Shakespearean-style results – think Romeo and Juliet meets Twelfth Night.

There’s also nods to The King’s Speech,  and even sympathetically mocking English take on the Arab spring “international horticulturalists against the decapitation of daffodils”. And “George Galloway” (Rupert Mason) makes a cameo appearance that went down very well on opening night.

The production  held together reasonably well, while giving the general feeling of being a bit under-rehearsed. The cast generally did a good job with the material, with the standout being de Deney’s Bogdan, who shows real stage presence.

It probably won’t surprise you to learn the Telegraph reviewer didn’t like it.

The production continues until June 9, with online booking.

Film Review: Rabbit Hole, directed by John Cameron Mitchell

by Sarah Cope

Seeing a film about a couple whose four-year-old son has recently been knocked down by a car and killed does not sound the most entertaining or enjoyable way of spending an evening. Perhaps that’s why the cinema old held 15 or so audience members at the showing I attended. However, there is much of worth in this depiction of grief, and despite it being a mainstream Hollywood film, it handled its subject matter deftly, and, importantly, unsentimentally.

Nicole Kidman, who has made many a duff film, is at her best here as Becca, the mother of the dead boy. She and husband Howie (Aaron Eckhart) have vastly different responses to the death, and this drives a wedge between them. Kidman’s Becca is angry, aggressive and determined to get on with life, at least on the surface. However, she then starts to “stalk” the teenager who was driving the car that hit her son, and strikes up an unlikely acquaintanceship with him.

It’s at this point that Kidman is basically acted right off the screen. Because Miles Teller, who plays Jason, is incredible. His flickering eyes, filling with tears, dart around as he explains that he may have been going “one or two kilometres over the speed limit” that day, and that he just wished he had driven down a different street. The scenes between Kidman and Teller were so naturalistic they felt almost improvised, but that is highly unlikely to be the case in such a big budget film.

The film isn’t all heavy going, though. Like Becca’s own inability to deal with her own grief, the narrative seemingly dances at the edge of sentimentality before – mercifully – pulling back and lightening the mood with humour. Humour, in a film about a dead four-year-old – how is that going to work? Well, it does, and the audience, small though we were, grasped at the lighter moments gratefully.

There are a few wrong notes, such as the scene where Jason just turns up at the couple’s house, enraging Howie, who doesn’t know that his wife has made contact with the boy. Another element that didn’t quite work was the title of the film, which is taken from the comic that Jason is drawing. This seemed ‘tagged on’ to the action, rather spuriously, and didn’t really add anything to the plot.

One other thing to note, and I hardly know whether to mention it: Kidman’s face. There has been much comment over the last few years about her lack of expression, with speculation that too much Botox was to blame. I didn’t find her face expressionless at all; the problem was actually much worse. She has clearly had a lot of what is referred to as “work” done (it seems, in Hollywood, that an actress, in order to get work needs to have “work” done), and this really proved distracting, to this audience member, at least. She looks neither old nor young, just plain wrong.

Of course, many Hollywood actresses have had plastic surgery, but this is the first time when it has actually got in my way of appreciating a performance.

Rabbit Hole is on general release.

Theatre Review: French Tales – The Untold Story of Sleeping Beauty at Institut Francais

by Sarah Cope

I have come to the conclusion that there are two types of shows put on for children. There is the type of show that takes into account the particular needs and foibles of this audience. The cast and the director will realise that children need short, snappy scenes, visual splendour and clear delivery. They need the action to be bold and they need to be seated in a way that takes into account their small stature. It seems obvious really, but then there is the other type of show…

This category of children’s show neglects all of the above, and as a result fails to engage its audience, leaving parents wondering how they could have better spent the ticket fee and also the time. Unfortunately, French Tales at the Institut Francais falls, in my opinion, most distinctly into the latter category.

The Institut is putting on different stories and plays each Saturday, so judging the calibre of every performance just by last Saturday’s show is perhaps not entirely fair; we can only hope that this was a blip in an otherwise marvellous season.

On arrival at the Institut Francais, signs were not good. People queued, unsure what they were queuing for, whilst children whined and misbehaved. So far, so bad. When the show eventually started, it became clear that it was to be staged in various different locations within the Institut, which meant following a “tour guide” around the building. This is never going to be easy with children, especially when, as we were at two points, positioned on some stairs for a whole scene.

My four-year-old mainly saw the backs of adults’ legs, and could hear very little. Sitting down on the floor, she whispered “Can we go home now?” I knew how she felt.

The premise was that our hapless ‘tour guide’ was showing us the palace where Sleeping Beauty had lived, but that things kept going wrong. At one point, two very stereotypical young female Japanese tourists interrupted the show, yelping “Photo! Photo!” One middle-class parent muttered to another middle-class parent “Well, that’s a bit…”, the unsaid word being ‘racist’. Yes, it was a bit.

After half an hour or so of following our ‘tour guide’ as she pretended that things were going very wrong (she really didn’t need to pretend!), my daughter and I cut our losses and left.

Back to the drawing board, Institut Francais.

Saturday French Tales continues throughout March.

Theatre: Celebrating the Love Letter, at POSTED, 67 Wilton Way, London E8

by Sarah Cope

A candle-lit post office is perhaps not the most obvious place to spend Valentine’s Day evening, but it certainly makes for a more original venue than an overpriced restaurant. The post office in question (or ex-post office, now an art gallery) has been reviewed here before, and tonight it kept its doors (and its still-present counter) open late for some love-themed happenings.

Actors from the Arcola Theatre appeared behind the post office counter and read from various love letters. We heard from Zelda Sayre, who, writing to her husband-to-be F Scott Fitzgerald, bid that he ‘wear [her] like a watch’. Richard Burton, on writing to Elizabeth Taylor in 1973, (he refers to her, somewhat dubiously, as ‘a remarkable and puritanical lady’), marked the envelope as ‘very private and personal’, which does make one wonder whether such letters should ever have reached the eyes of the public, destined as they each were for a very select audience of one.

Jessica Piddock, who has made a prison uniform out of shredded, woven letters from prisoners on death row in the US (this piece hangs in the window of the shop), read from a letter she had received from one of the prisoners she corresponded with for the project. The man had become convinced that he and the artists were ‘soulmates’, and Piddock had had to disabuse him of this notion. His letter in response to this news, both bashful and sweet, was possibly the most moving moment of the evening.

Somewhat incongruously, two figures dressed as old women sat near the counter throughout the evening, sewing pincushions. This was in fact Zoe Sinclair and Andrea Blood, who are the artistic duo called “The Girls”. Described by The Evening Standard as “Angela Carter crossed with Cindy Sherman”, their both disturbing and humorous photographs were available to buy in postcard form. Perhaps the most bizarre – and oddly beautiful image – shows Blood naked, crouching on a roasting tin like a turkey, about to be placed in an oven. Another photograph (‘The Garden Party’) shows Sinclair lying on a picnic table, clad only in strategically-placed swiss rolls and petit fours. A vicar helps himself to a canapé from her shin.

Watch out for ‘The Girls’ at their show later this year, where they will be having a joint show with pioneer of feminist art Margaret Harrison, entitled ‘I Am A Fantasy’ at the PayneShurvell Gallery (15th April – 21st May 2011).

The Posted Gallery exhibition is open until 26 February.

« Older posts Newer posts »