My London Your London

A cultural guide

Theatre Review: The Andersen Project by Robert Lepage’s Ex Machina

It is seldom that you get to see a master actor, and a master creator, at the top of his or her form. Robert Lepage’s The Andersen Project at the Barbican is one such show. If you have to borrow the cash, or sleep with someone to get a ticket, do it.

You could write a summary that would make the plot sound like a bad Victorian novel. This account of Frederic, the Canadian pop lyricist brought to Paris to write a libretto inspired by one of the darker fairytales of Hans Christian Anderson for a European “co-operative” project right out of the horror files of the Telegraph, is, however, instead a deeply human story that never strikes a false note.

There are plenty of laughs, with a rapid-fire string of European and Atlantic arts in-jokes that almost, but not quite, descend to a stand-up routine. You are, however, always laughing with Lepage, never at him. On the wilder artistic avant garde: “what makes the English furious makes the French delirious”.

This is a one-man show, in the sense that Lepage plays not only the would-be librettist, seeking professional and personal validation, but also all of the other characters, from Arnaud, the conniving but troubled administrator of the Paris Opera, to the Dryad of Anderson’s tale. Yet there’s a long list of technical credits, from the puppeteer who produces a wonderfully believable mutt out of thin air to the “horse cart-maker”, and these are well deserved. Every aspect of The Andersen Project from the supra-realist video backdrops to the elaborate but designerista set, has been polished to almost eerie perfection.

Often in one-person productions, each individual character is seen in one dimension; it is the only way many actors can manage all those different roles. Yet Lepage’s characters are fully rounded. So the Opera director, that Machievellian master of arts politics, morphs quite naturally into a fond father reading a sad bedtime story (Anderson’s other contribution to the show, The Shadow) to a beloved daughter, a daughter he fears he is about to lose, along with his wife.

I did initially doubt Lepage’s Dryad – she seemed too stiff, too thick, yet when you think about it, even an ethereal being who has spent her life cramped within one small walnut tree is going to move awkwardly, slowly, when suddenly unleashed for one magic day on the streets of Paris and amidst the World Fair of 1855 that inspired Andersen.

This is a production like a matrioshka doll; both character and themes are exposed by the delicate peeling of fine layers. Each small action and omission will come to have meaning; each betrayal, each lie, each Fall will claim its price in time. Even an apparent joke, such as the rope that features ridiculously in a solemn commentary in the museum that commemorates Denmark’s greatest national figure, turns out to have far more significance than any in the audience might have imagined.

The production continues until February 18. Links: The Barbican production page; Lepage’s own description of the show’s development; other views of this production – the Telegraph, the Evening Standard.


  1. saw it tonight and was engaged throughout despite the vertiginous seats of the upper circle which like mrs danvers seem to surreptitiously incline you into the pit. i found myself at a loss to describe it, simply transformed in the telling into ‘the bad victorian novel’ you describe. i went on a whim; meant to check him out years ago but … moved to tears of joy when he danced with the strobe. its the affect within ‘the eerily polished’ – and the authority of the insight into human nature – the manipulator in relapse re his sex addiction. no false notes. i kept checking the programme to assure myself it was just him – uncanny. I struggled with the dryad’s ‘woodenness’despite the obvious and felt the descent of disbelief – no, thats not fair, more accurately it was the one time in 2 hours i felt i had to work hard and that was more a minor technical point; the lack of fuse between her and the contemporary 1867 backdrop. anyway, thanks for an excellent review.

  2. Natalie

    February 12, 2006 at

    Thanks Nick, glad you enjoyed the review and the show.

  3. Please do yourself a favour and keep the money for something else. There are a lot of interesting visual ideas in the andersen project but it’s repetitive and boring after 20 minutes to see all these flashes and no real content.

  4. Colette Gosselin

    April 22, 2006 at

    Please let me know how I can get tickets to his show in Montreal May 16.Thanks Colette

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.